HomeHome  Latest imagesLatest images  SearchSearch  RegisterRegister  Log in  

 

 Stacking Spheres

Go down 
3 posters
AuthorMessage
NoCoPilot

NoCoPilot


Posts : 20443
Join date : 2013-01-16
Age : 70
Location : Seattle

Stacking Spheres Empty
PostSubject: Stacking Spheres   Stacking Spheres EmptySat Nov 18, 2017 11:42 pm

Back to top Go down
_Howard
Admin
_Howard


Posts : 8734
Join date : 2013-01-16
Age : 79
Location : California

Stacking Spheres Empty
PostSubject: Re: Stacking Spheres   Stacking Spheres EmptySun Nov 19, 2017 1:50 pm

Sounds like the mathematical correlative of herding cats.
Back to top Go down
richard09

richard09


Posts : 4276
Join date : 2013-01-16

Stacking Spheres Empty
PostSubject: Re: Stacking Spheres   Stacking Spheres EmptySun Nov 19, 2017 4:23 pm

wikipedia wrote:
In 2016, Maryna Viazovska announced a proof that the E8 lattice provides the optimal packing (regardless of regularity) in eight-dimensional space,[10] and soon afterwards she and a group of collaborators announced a similar proof that the Leech lattice is optimal in 24 dimensions.[11] This result built on and improved previous methods which showed that these two lattices are very close to optimal.[12] The new proofs involve using the Laplace transform of a carefully-chosen modular function to construct a radially-symmetric function f such that f and its Fourier transform f̂ both equal one at the origin, and both vanish at all other points of the optimal lattice, with f negative outside the central sphere of the packing and f̂ positive. Then, the Poisson summation formula for f is used to compare the density of the optimal lattice with that of any other packing.[13] Before the proof had been formally refereed and published, mathematician Peter Sarnak called the proof "stunningly simple" and wrote that "You just start reading the paper and you know this is correct."

Maybe.
Back to top Go down
NoCoPilot

NoCoPilot


Posts : 20443
Join date : 2013-01-16
Age : 70
Location : Seattle

Stacking Spheres Empty
PostSubject: Re: Stacking Spheres   Stacking Spheres EmptySun Nov 19, 2017 5:53 pm

What I found interesting is that an optimal sphere-packing scheme uses up 74% of the space. A random, uncontrolled scheme uses up on average just 64%.

I wouldn't have guessed a ten percent improvement.
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content





Stacking Spheres Empty
PostSubject: Re: Stacking Spheres   Stacking Spheres Empty

Back to top Go down
 
Stacking Spheres
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» Too dangerous? Iowa Senate bans box-stacking tradition for pages

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
 :: Topics :: Science & Tech-
Jump to: